Weekly Brief
×Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Financial Services Review
Thank you for Subscribing to Financial Services Review Weekly Brief
By
Financial Services Review | Friday, August 22, 2025
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Fremont, CA: Over the past ten years, the financial markets have undergone a significant transformation due to waves of technical advancements, regulation changes, and investor behavior shifts. The market structure reform is arguably the most important of the numerous structural changes imposed on broker-dealers regarding their future. Changes in market structure have grown in importance over the past few years, mainly posing a significant obstacle to broker-dealers' efforts to improve investor protection, increase market transparency, and address market fragmentation issues. Despite its good intentions, this wave of change presents broker-dealers with several operational, technological, and strategic obstacles.
Markets were made more transparent and fair through market structure reforms after the 2008 financial crisis. Systemic risk was lowered, and trading system integrity improved through intervention by the regulator. For broker-dealers, a new regulatory landscape is now centered on investor protection and market efficiency. It had to adhere to the strictest reporting requirements, best execution, and fee transparency thanks to regulations like Europe's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II. The existing technology and data management systems would require much up-grading.
However, this increase in ATS and dark pools disperses liquidities across venues through which broker-dealers have to navigate, an issue that requires advanced algorithms, sophisticated trading technologies, and comprehensive data analytics tools. High costs for these technologies may make them unaffordable to smaller broker-dealers, creating concerns over the consolidation of industry activities and decreased competition—the market structure reforms aimed at reducing conflicts of interest with broker-dealers.
Calls for reforms in broker-dealers within the US are growing as financial incentives and regulatory pressure mount. Reforms center on increased transparency in pay-for-order flow arrangements and more demanding compliance with regulatory standards. The boom in GameStop trading has led to changes in these broker-dealers' business models, characterized by profitability, emphasis on client interests, and greater regulatory compliance. New technologies such as blockchain and DeFi are even reshaping the broker-dealer model, requiring them to consider new market structures and asset classes.
The quest for greater efficiency and transparency in trading comes with new risks and regulatory challenges. Broker-dealers, therefore, have to lead these developments by making new investments in emerging infrastructure, augmenting cybersecurity measures, and ensuring compliance with the emerging regulatory frameworks for digital assets. Market structure reforms also point to opportunities that broker-dealers are willing to adopt. With innovation and improvement in their technological capabilities, broker-dealers will enhance the operational efficiency of their business, reduce costs, and thereby offer better services to clients.
The reforms can also create new revenue sources for those willing to expand into trading digital assets or developing data analytics services. In addition, broker-dealers that emphasize transparency, best execution, and client interests will enjoy an advantage in a market that is increasingly investor-trust-based and regulated.