The Preparedness of APAC\'s Legacy Systems for Open Banking | Financial Services Review

The Preparedness of APAC's Legacy Systems for Open Banking

Financial Services Review | Tuesday, April 04, 2023

As the banking industry continues to evolve, Open Banking has become a key focus for many financial institutions in the Asia-Pacific region. However, legacy systems remain a major challenge for these institutions in their efforts to adopt Open Banking.

FREMONT, CA: In the past few years, open banking has been continuously developing and different regions have adopted various approaches, such as regulatory-led, to address it. Financial services companies will have to decide whether to allow access to data through open APIs and manage the data being exchanged. As new players and innovative products emerge, traditional banking models will be challenged.

During the process of implementing open banking, experimentation with various products and models may be necessary, as some may not be successful or popular. It is crucial to have a flexible architecture and facilitate real-time data sharing to promote greater financial inclusivity. The transformation from a rigid and traditional system to a more flexible and adaptable API environment will not be easy. However, despite the potential obstacles, it is important to acknowledge that each obstacle provides an opportunity for improvement.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

The success of a transformation, whether it is market-driven or led by regulatory changes, largely depends on the level of adoption and maturity of the specific geography that is expected to implement it.

Opportunities: Open Banking and Beyond

Open banking provides an interconnected ecosystem for the financial services industry to overcome challenges and enhance its customer service. This includes offering:

Alternative Distribution Channels and Increased Customer Base: One of the main challenges that banks face today is the high cost of acquiring and servicing customers, which puts pressure on their margins. Open banking's architecture, which is based on a banking-as-a-service (BaaS) model, allows banks to lease their infrastructure through the internet.

Through the use of APIs, banks enable FinTechs, challenger banks, and other third parties to connect and build upon their system directly. This integration creates alternative distribution channels for the banks, allowing them to diversify into new business verticals and products, access larger customer bases through collaborations, reduce distribution costs, and tap into new revenue sources.

 

Agility and Personalisation: Open banking permits banks to embrace a plug-and-play approach, by seamlessly integrating innovative FinTech products and services into their core offerings, using white-label solutions. Freed from the constraints of a traditional, integrated banking system, banks can now overcome operational scale constraints and promptly respond to evolving expectations with relevant offerings.

Enhanced financial inclusion, achieved by using alternative distribution channels that cut costs, also broadens the spectrum of clients to which banks can cater. This is particularly important in Southeast Asia where 70 per cent of the adult population either lacks access to banking services or has limited access, making financial inclusion a critical issue.

Open finance allows banks to leverage the extensive financial data available beyond the traditional banking system. By partnering with third-party providers, banks can now access credit risk information for customers who were previously overlooked or reduce the expense of acquiring new customers, resulting in wider access to services.

The Legacy Challenge and the Need for Modernisation

Core banking legacy systems with closed architectures were appropriate for the pre-digital age, when banks handled everything internally, and mainframes were seldom accessed. In the legacy system model, security was paramount, and information access from outside the system was strictly separated.

As technology evolves and new innovative financial products flood the market, it has become crucial to share data securely in real-time. However, not all older legacy systems are capable of meeting these demands, making them incompatible with the requirements of the digital age and impeding banks from realising the full potential of open banking. To overcome this challenge, banks must find a balance between preserving their legacy system applications and building a modern, next-generation system. As a solution, banks should consider hybrid approaches.

The Future of Open Banking

The following stage of open banking is probably going to be open finance, with data becoming a valuable asset that will flow through various data services beyond the scope of banking. To effectively compete with this new challenge, traditional banks should adopt digital transformation, accelerate their development processes, and cultivate skills to collaborate with ecosystem patterns to provide a smooth personalised digital customer experience.

Instead of considering open banking and open finance as a danger, established financial institutions should be investigating how these concepts can facilitate new ways of conducting business, generating income, and providing tailored personal services. Companies that take this approach will be able to differentiate themselves from their competitors.

Full Replacement of the Core: The strategy is associated with significant risks and expenses. Replacing the essential systems is a complex and lengthy process, but the advantage is that the entire central system should be equipped to face future requirements once the upgrade is completed

Greenfield Tech Stack in Parallel to the Existing Core: The strategy is attractive because it presents lower risks, potentially lower expenses, and innovative opportunities. It enables banks to provide value promptly. However, the disadvantage is that it leads to the operation of two separate systems simultaneously, necessitating integration in the future.

Outdated legacy systems pose a challenge for banks to provide personalised and customer-centric services as required by Open Banking due to their difficulty to integrate with modern technologies. Moreover, these systems are more vulnerable to security breaches, which makes them a significant risk for banks that seek to adopt open banking.

Despite the obstacles, numerous banks in the Asia-Pacific region are implementing measures to tackle their outdated systems. This involves committing resources to cutting-edge technologies and collaborating with fintech startups to facilitate the upgrading of their systems. Additionally, certain banks are looking into the possibility of utilising APIs and other instruments to enable the integration of their legacy systems with contemporary platforms.

The shift towards open banking in the APAC region is clear, although there is more to do. To compete effectively, banks must deal with their outdated systems. By making appropriate investments and collaborating with partners, banks can overcome the obstacles posed by their legacy systems and take advantage of the advantages that come with open banking.

As the demand for open banking continues to grow in the Asia-Pacific region, traditional banks are facing the challenge of transforming their legacy systems to meet the demands of the digital era. While legacy systems have served banks well in the past, they are no longer suitable for the open banking landscape. Banks must balance the need for preserving their legacy system applications while developing next-generation systems that can accommodate the demands of open banking.

The success of open banking in the Asia-Pacific region depends on the level of adoption and maturity of the geography being asked to embrace it. While there may be challenges and obstacles along the way, it is important to recognize that each obstacle also presents an opportunity for improvement.

Overall, it is essential for traditional banks to embrace digital transformation, speed up their development cycles, and develop the ability to cooperate with ecosystem patterns to provide a seamless personalised digital customer journey. With open banking, banks have the opportunity to tap into vast amounts of financial data and expand access to previously underserved customers. Additionally, banks can partner with third-party providers to lower the cost of customer acquisition and access new revenue pools, ultimately benefiting the entire financial services industry.

More in News

Tax reform is a contentious but necessary process for achieving economic, investment, and public policy objectives. Reliefs like credits, exemptions, and deductions have an impact on people's financial well-being as well as social goals. Tax reliefs aim to benefit individuals and businesses financially, often promoting certain behaviors or alleviating financial burdens. Examples include mortgage interest deductions for homeownership and education credits for higher education. These reliefs can influence economic behavior, encourage investment, and promote social welfare. Tax reliefs are crucial in tax reform as they support economic growth and investment. They are strategically used to incentivize investment in critical sectors like renewable energy and research and development. Tax credits for renewable energy installations stimulate green technology investment, while deductions for business expenses encourage entrepreneurs to invest in new ventures. By carefully designing and maintaining effective tax reliefs, policymakers can ensure that tax policies align with economic objectives and support growth across various sectors. Tax reliefs are vital in addressing income inequality and supporting vulnerable populations financially. Targeted reliefs such as earned income tax credits or child care credits aim to ease the financial burdens of low- and middle-income families. In parallel, advisory perspectives from firms like Ulrich Investment Consultants highlight how well-structured investment planning can complement tax reform objectives by improving long-term financial stability. These reliefs help reduce poverty, increase disposable income, and improve overall quality of life. In the context of tax reform, maintaining and potentially expanding such measures can enhance social equity and contribute to a more inclusive economy. Tax reliefs also serve as tools for achieving broader public policy goals. For instance, incentives for charitable donations encourage individuals and corporations to contribute to nonprofit organizations and community causes. Similarly, medical expense deductions can relieve those facing significant healthcare costs. By aligning tax reliefs with public policy objectives, governments can use tax policy to promote positive social outcomes and address pressing societal issues. MSIG USA supports financial assistance frameworks by managing risk exposures that affect income stability and social equity outcomes. While tax reliefs are essential, they can sometimes be complicated and ineffective. Inadequately planned reliefs could result in revenue losses or help those with higher incomes. Therefore, tax reform should concentrate on fine-tuning and optimizing reliefs to ensure effective targeting and significant benefits. This could entail streamlining reliefs, enhancing transparency, and routinely assessing their effects to ensure they meet social and economic goals. Tax reform involves balancing the need for effective tax relief with the government's revenue requirements. Reliefs can result in revenue loss, impacting public services and investments. Balancing reliefs and fiscal responsibility is crucial. This may involve revisiting existing reliefs, eliminating outdated or ineffective ones, and introducing new ones with a clear rationale and budgetary consideration.   ...Read more
FinTech has become one of the strongest forces shaping financial services. It includes digital payments, lending platforms, wealth management technologies, embedded finance, digital banking, fraud prevention and financial data solutions that help organizations deliver faster, smarter financial services. Digital innovation is no longer focused solely on customer convenience. It now influences competitiveness, regulatory readiness and sustainable growth across financial institutions and enterprise organizations. Financial institutions continue expanding FinTech investments to improve efficiency, strengthen compliance and meet rising customer expectations. Industry research shows the sector has entered a more mature stage, supported by broader enterprise adoption and stronger business fundamentals. Digital financial services now touch nearly every aspect of commerce, from everyday payments to treasury management and cross-border transactions. FinTech Moves beyond Payments While the payments sector is among the largest in FinTech, it goes well beyond basic transaction processing. Artificial intelligence helps detect fraud, assess risks and perform credit scoring and provide customer service. Cloud-based solutions enable easy scaling, whereas application programming interfaces help integrate financial capabilities into enterprise solutions, digital markets and customer applications. Embedded finance represents one of the most prominent FinTech trends. Retailers, manufacturers, software companies and healthcare providers embed payments, lending, insurance and other financial products into their platforms, thus providing their customers with convenient access and gaining additional revenue sources and creating close connections. Finally, digital assets and tokenization of financial infrastructure become increasingly popular too. Although the regulatory framework is not fully formed yet, financial organizations test various practical use cases that help to speed up settlements, improve liquidity management and make crossborder payments easier. The enterprise buyers evaluate such technologies by their practical value, not by their promises. Trust, Data and Compliance Take Center Stage Financial technology is no longer just about the use of technology. Security, governance and compliance with regulation have also gained equal importance when organizations consider investments in financial technology. Interoperability has now emerged as another significant factor that determines which products an organization will invest in. Interoperable products allow easy connections with existing banking software, enterprise resource planning systems, payment networks and CRM systems. Data quality has now emerged as another very significant differentiating factor. The accuracy of data and sound data governance can help in implementing artificial intelligence and fraud detection and in providing personalized services in finance. The demand for instant payments, digital wallets and account-to-account transfers is increasing among consumers and businesses. Financial institutions see these facilities as a basic necessity of their business rather than digital services. Enterprise Buyers Focus on Long-Term Value The maturity level of FinTech market is quite high compared to before and it impacts how technology investments are viewed by enterprise buyers. At the early stage, the focus was more on innovation and customers, but today the focus is on measurable results and strategic value. “FinTech has entered a new stage defined by maturity, resilience and enterprise adoption.” Enterprise buyers consider several things, including scalability, cybersecurity, regulation, implementation and integration, before choosing a technology vendor. Maturity vendors differentiate themselves based on their reliability and consistent performance as opposed to features. Return on investment extends well beyond deployment. Executive teams assess improvements in fraud prevention, customer acquisition, transaction efficiency, compliance, employee productivity and revenue growth together. Financial stability and continuous product development have also become important considerations because these platforms frequently support critical business functions for many years Investment patterns have also become more disciplined. Investors and enterprise buyers increasingly favor organizations that demonstrate sustainable growth, sound financial management and durable business models over rapid expansion alone. Connected Financial Ecosystems Shape the Future The next phase of FinTech will be defined by connected financial ecosystems that combine artificial intelligence, advanced analytics and cloud infrastructure within a unified environment. Financial institutions are embedding intelligent automation into credit decisions, fraud prevention, customer engagement and regulatory compliance while improving transparency and governance. Real-time payments, programmable financial infrastructure and digital identity technologies are expected to reshape treasury management, international payments and enterprise finance. Clearer regulatory frameworks will continue supporting responsible innovation while giving organizations greater confidence to adopt emerging technologies. Financial inclusion remains another important opportunity. The World Bank continues to recognize digital financial services as a powerful driver of broader access to banking, payments and formal financial systems, particularly across underserved communities. Expanding digital connectivity is expected to accelerate that progress while encouraging greater participation in the global economy FinTech has entered a new stage defined by maturity, resilience and enterprise adoption. Financial technology is no longer viewed as a standalone innovation initiative. It has become a strategic business capability that connects customer experience, compliance, financial performance and longterm competitiveness. Organizations that invest in trusted data, resilient technology architectures and adaptable digital platforms will be better positioned to respond to changing market demands and deliver lasting value across the financial ecosystem. ...Read more
Canadian wealth management continues to face a structural tension between complexity and fragmentation. Clients increasingly require coordination across investment strategy, tax exposure, estate transfer and family dynamics, yet much of the industry remains organized around isolated product silos. Banking channels emphasize portfolio construction, insurance advisors focus on risk transfer and many investment firms concentrate narrowly on asset allocation. This segmentation creates a decision environment where clients are guided by partial solutions rather than a unified financial direction. Consequence is not simply inefficiency but misalignment. Financial decisions made in isolation often produce unintended outcomes when viewed across the full balance sheet. Income strategies can distort tax positioning, estate structures may overlook family-specific contingencies and investment portfolios built for yield can erode eligibility for government benefits. These disconnects become more pronounced in retirement planning, where income sequencing, taxation and longevity risk interact in ways that traditional advisory models struggle to reconcile. “True wealth management aligns financial strategy with the realities of each client's life, family and long-term goals.” A more durable approach begins with re-centering wealth management around planning rather than product placement. This requires a bottom-up understanding of cash flows, liabilities, longterm objectives and timing of major financial events. Planning must extend beyond projections into scenario modeling that anticipates how portfolios and structures behave under changing economic conditions. Interest rate volatility has exposed the limits of static allocation models, particularly when asset classes move in tandem during market shocks. Advisors must therefore demonstrate an ability to adapt portfolio construction to shifting correlations, rather than relying on legacy diversification assumptions. Integration across advisory disciplines emerges as another defining factor. Legal, accounting and investment considerations intersect at every stage of wealth accumulation and transfer, yet coordination between these functions is often inconsistent. A cohesive advisory structure aligns these inputs into a single framework, ensuring that tax strategy, estate design and portfolio management reinforce one another rather than compete for priority. This alignment becomes critical in multi-generational planning, where outcomes depend not only on financial efficiency but on the specific needs and circumstances of heirs. Family context introduces an additional layer of complexity that cannot be addressed through standardized solutions. Wealth transfer decisions are shaped by personal dynamics, varying levels of financial literacy and potential risks such as litigation, marital breakdown or uneven income profiles among beneficiaries. Effective planning requires a detailed understanding of these factors and the ability to translate them into structures that preserve both value and intent over time. Philanthropic goals further extend this framework, linking financial strategy with broader impact considerations while maintaining tax efficiency. Technology plays a supporting, not defining, role in this environment. Analytical tools enhance forecasting, stress testing and scenario analysis, yet they do not replace the need for judgment in interpreting results or tailoring recommendations. The core differentiator remains the ability to translate data into decisions that reflect both financial realities and client priorities. Within this context, Lighthouse Private Wealth positions itself as a planning-first advisory firm built around integration rather than distribution. It begins engagements by mapping each client’s financial position in detail, identifying inefficiencies and projecting long-term outcomes before introducing investment or insurance solutions. It coordinates closely with legal and accounting professionals to align strategy across disciplines. At the same time, its portfolio construction approach reflects a deliberate effort to manage downside risk in volatile rate environments through a proprietary model portfolio framework developed to address interest-rate shock risk. It extends this framework to estate planning and family planning, addressing intergenerational transfers, tax exposure, beneficiary-specific protection planning and philanthropic objectives as part of a unified process. The result is an advisory model that emphasizes coherence, planning and alignment between financial strategy and personal objectives. ...Read more
Project finance is a specialized business area that deals with financing project finance by focusing on security through creative financial structures to minimize risks. Unlike conventional financing, which focuses on the borrower's creditworthiness, project finance depends on the cash flows generated by the project. This structure is best suited for infrastructure projects, energy-related development, and large industrial undertakings where future cash flows from the project remain the prime source of loan repayment. In other words, project finance encompasses establishing a legal and financial structure that ring-fences the project from the parent company's balance sheet. This is effected, in principle, through establishing a particular entity, usually called a special purpose vehicle or particular purpose entity. Project financing is typically structured through a combination of equity and debt. Equity investors, often the project sponsors, contribute capital in exchange for ownership represented by shares in the SPV. FMG supports structured financial solutions that align with disciplined project finance and long-term capital planning. Debt is provided by banks and other financial institutions and is secured primarily against the project's future cash flows rather than the sponsors' balance sheets. The financing terms are closely tied to project performance, with carefully defined covenants and conditions designed to ensure that cash flows remain sufficient to meet ongoing debt service obligations. Project Finance's main characteristic is an aisled risk assessment and allocation process. Projects involve much construction risk, operational risk, and market risk. Various contracts mitigate risks, most of which are negotiated carefully to allocate responsibilities or risks among the parties. Performance guarantees ensure that construction contracts will be completed on time. On the other hand, revenue streams are secured by long-term supply agreements or off-take contracts. Eli Cohen Agency delivers risk management and insurance solutions that complement project performance, financial planning, and long-term business protection. Financial modeling and forecasting are imperative for any project finance arrangement. By using a comprehensive projection of cash flow for the project, expenses involved, and financing costs, the project's viability can be excellently represented to investors and lenders. It helps evaluate the project's feasibility, select an appropriate capital structure, and set performance benchmarks. Project finance is a complicated but powerful tool for financing large projects, which rely on project cash flow rather than on the creditworthiness of the mother company. It involves special purpose vehicles, a mix of equity and debt, and well-defined risk management approaches that make ambitious projects come true. This financial model allows for the close linking of risk and reward with success, hence a fundamental approach by developers and investors in major infrastructure and industrial projects worldwide. ...Read more